PERSECUTION OF HINDUS

Guys today I'm sharing a really interesting topic on the PERSECUTION OF HINDUS and to prove how people are using Wikipedia as a tool to spread fake narratives on this topic to the world. This article is written by me. Please do read and share

First I would like to share the link of Wikipedia which is used to spread fake narratives on this topic for comparison with my article:- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Hindus

Hindus have sustained systematic persecution, violence and religious antagonism for centuries

Let's start with template distraction:

Many evidences have been brought into light indicating large scale Hindu temples demolition during the sultanate period

According to Peter Jackson and Andre Wick, Hindus have been termed 'Kafirs' in the Islamic texts and Muslims are called upon to do 'Jihad' (attack on Hindus)

Temples in the northern India was the most affected by the religious antagonism of sultanate. As compared to south India we see very few temples in North India. Khajuraho's temples remained intact as they were well hidden under the forest and templates in Rajasthan were fiercely protected by the Rajputs.

The most recent example on how Muslim use to destroy ancient Temple and religious place is, in 2001, the Bamiyan Buddhist statues were completely destroyed by Taliban.

There is dearth of Scriptures of Hindu traditions, partly due to lack of enthusiasm among Hindus to record history and partly due to invaders.

Bakhtiyar Khalji destroyed Nalanda and Vikramshila universities between 1193 AD and 1197 AD. More than 90 lakh manuscripts were burned and monks were massacred at large scale by Bakthiyar Khailji and Nalanda universities was burning for continuously month not because Nalanda universities was that big but is was burning for a months because millions of manuscripts were burning in that universities. At that time there was no one to protect Hindus from atrocities.

Now lets see societal changes.

Hindus were designated as 'Dhimmis' and they were considered to be protected by the Muslims. They had no equal rights as Muslims had during that time.  Hindus were mandated to pay extra taxes such as Jiziya and Kharaj (50% of land revenue) while Muslims were to pay Zakar and Ushr (10% of land revenue). This shows the gross discrimination against Hindu in society.

The tradition of 'Jauhar' was first recorded in 1303 AD when many women in Chittorgarh fort committed suicide by jumping in fire. To protect themself from Alauddin Khalji.

If we see the marriage tradition of North India as compared to South India in North India Hindu do all the processes of marriage at night and in South India Hindus do all the processes of marriage at day. Now you think during that time there was no electricity or modern technology then why did Hindus use to choose night to complete the processes of marriage? It was due to fear of foreign intruders that Hindus had to adopt a tradition of marriage in the night's dark. Unlike North India, in Southern India there was no fear of foreign intruders and therefore they have the tradition of day marriage.

During the Delhi Sultanate, slavery in India reach at its zenith. 

Today also in afghanistan ghazni there is a stumb from the time of Mahmud Ghazni. Mahmud Ghazni was the Emperor who attacked India 17 times and on that stumb, it is mentioned 'Dukhtare hindustan nilame 2 dinar' which means on that place Indian women use to be sold for 2 dinar (That time gold coin currency 1 dinar means 1 gold coin).

In 1026, during the reign of Bhima I, the Turkic Muslim ruler Mahmud of Ghazni raided and plundered the Somnath temple, broke its jyotirlinga. He took away a booty of 20 million dinars and also in attacked 17 times on Somnath temple and looted it for 17 times. The invasion of Somnath site in 1026 CE is also confirmed by other Islamic historians such as Gardizi, Ibn Zafir and Ibn al-Athir.

In 1267 AD, Balban inducted more than 60,000 slaves in the Mewat region and when they were asked to convert to Islam which they refused to then Balban killed more than 60,000 Hindus with cruelty and it is mentioned in the state patronised Historians of during that time and termed the killing 60,000 slaves as "necessary" for law and order. But is it justified that killing more than 60,000 people was necessary for law and order?

Ibn Batuta, a Moroccan traveller, who came to India during Tughlaqs, wrote extensively about slavery in India and he has mentioned that the people who use to refuse to convert to Islam use to be held as a slave and treated very badly.

Have you ever wondered why 'Hindukush Mountains' was named as a 'Hindukush'? Because Hindukush derives its name from the fact that the Himalayan routes were used to carry the slaves from India to Turkistan resulting in their death. Ibn Batuta, have mentioned this he has never watched such cruelty with slave in any part of the world during that time.

In today world ISIS is setting up such citations in front of the world. Raping women selling them for slavery kill them for fun training kids to spread terrorism selling kids for slavery killing innocent kids in the name of jihad forcing men to convert if they convert they live and get trained to be a terrorist and if they refused kill them brutally in different ways to show the world who they are and what is their capabilities. Violence unleashed by ISIS can be seen as a parallel of atrocities against Hindus in the medieval India and it was continued during the Mughals period as well but with little modernised way.

Now let's see the economic changes in India during the Mughals rules:

'Halal Economic' in a 'Halal Economic', Muslims are allowed to eat only those food allowed under Kuran and it is followed in todays date also by Muslims. Due to this change, Hindus face huge losses due to changes in livelihood. The segregation of economy in accordance to Muslim religious principles and causes tremendous economic loss for Hindus and it was huge discrimination against Hindus.

The attack of Ahmed Shah Abdali between the period of 1748-1767 also caused heavy setbacks for Punjab's economy. It is said, Ahmed Shah Abdali attacks India from Punjab to Delhi 18 times repeatedly from 1748-1767 which crumbled the economy of Punjab. During that time a saying was got popular in Punjab 'Khada pita lahe da baki Ahmed shahe da' it means what we eat and what we wear only that is ours and rest of things belongs to Ahmed Shah Abdali. This saying in Punjabi tells us of the horrors inflicted by Ahmed Shah Abdali. A very large part of the Punjab savaged by him is in present day Pakistan. And Pakistan celebrates its own rape & plunder by naming its missile ABDALI.

Mughal Emperor ordered to burn all crops while invading Ahmed shahi's kingdom in the Deccan between 1630 AD and 1633 AD because of which more than 60% of the population of that place died due to hunger and no food they were starved to death can you imagine the pain? and you can find these details in the sources of Portuguese. 

Now let's study the worst part of this topic Regional Discontent.

Now i will tell you about the cruellest ruler of India and his name is Sikandar Butshikan. Sikandar Butshikan was the cruellest ruler of Hindustan. He belonged to Shah Miri dynasty of Kashmir and he ruled during the 15th century. He inflicted heavy violence against the natives, Hindus and Buddhists. He wanted to convert each and every person to Islam. He sought to convert all his subjects into Islam. For his notoriourity, he was called 'Butshikan (Idol-breaker)" because he destroyed countless Temple. In his rules, Hindus were prohibited from dance, drama, music and even Hindus use to pay extra tax to do the cremation according to them. He also destroyed Bijbehara and Martand Sun temples.

During his reign, many Hindus left the region and many were also got killed like now in Kashmir. It is said Sikandar Butshikan burned 7 tils (7 huge houses size) of the sacred thread (The sacred thread is a marker of Wisdom and Knowledge in Brahmin) which he collected after killing the Brahmins from their dead bodies can you imagine the number of killings? Sikandar's brutal reign against Hindus was amongst the cruellest chapter of Hindustan.

This was is just the tip of the iceberg

Please do your research as well and you can add remaining in the comment box and suggestions are most welcome

Thank you 🙏